Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

What's good for Africa is good for...Africa

Obama goes to Ghana and gives a "tough love" speech, preaching - seriously, he was practically hectoring these poor people -- to Africans that they need to get their house in order, embrace good governance, democracy, human rights and free trade, and stop blaming the West and colonialism for all their problems.  Where was this guy in Cairo?  Why isn't this kind of talk considered patronizing meddling or hypocritical (because of Gitmo, Abu Ghraib, etc.) when Obama does it in Africa, but would be if he were to say it to -- for example -- Iran or any other Middle Eastern country, Honduras, Russia or China, just to name a few who recently could have used a dose of "tough love" from Dr. O?  

I continue to be amused by the lack of critical response to this bipolar (multi-polar?) policy approach on the part of the liberal media.  Republicans are not being effective in taking advantage of his so-flexible-as-to-appear-unprincipled approach to foreign policy.  The WSJ has a good piece on this speech that should serve as a roadmap for not only pointing out his wildly divergent regional foreign policies, but linking them up to some of his worst domestic policy ideas.  
Sphere: Related Content

Friday, June 19, 2009

Aung San Suu Kyi's Birthday and Iran, con't.

Today is the birthday of Burmese democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi.  She will "celebrate" this birthday like she has so many others in confinement; the major difference this year is that she is confined to Burma's notorious Insein Prison, rather than her home.  My thoughts and prayers are with her today.  Having been privileged to spend nearly two days with The Lady, as she is known in Burma, I feel personally connected to her.  My meetings with her took place in the summer of 2002, when she was enjoying a brief period of freedom from her long-running house arrest.  She was focused on rebuilding her political party, which had been decimated by years of unrelenting pressure by Burma's brutal military regime.  When she traveled around the country, she was greeted by throngs of Burmese who braved the regime's network of spies and torturers to reassert their desire for freedom and democracy.  In person, Suu was warm and funny and almost comically small - she probably weighs 90 pounds wet - but you could sense the steel that lay beneath her elegant exterior.  The regime certainly has never been fooled by the pretty flowers she wears in her hair and her delicate manners - they know she is a force and fear her as such.  She is an inspirational person by any measure and I feel so privileged to have had the opportunity to know her even a little.  I hope that I will someday have the chance to renew our acquaintance under better circumstances.  For today, I am just going to light some incense and say a prayer for her well-being.

Which brings us to Iran.  David Brooks has written a good piece in the NYT today about the US response to the situation in Iran.  Money quote:

Foreign policy experts are trained in the art of analysis, extrapolation and linear thinking. They simply have no tools to analyze moments that are non-linear, paradigm-shifting and involve radical shifts in consciousness. As a result, they almost invariably underestimate how rapid change might be and how quickly it might come. As Michael McFaul, a democracy expert who serves on the National Security Council, once wrote: “In retrospect, all revolutions seem inevitable. Beforehand, all revolutions seem impossible.”


Worth thinking about as you listen to the "experts" talk about how we need to be "pragmatic" and "realistic" about what is happening.  While it is true that we should never get ahead of the protesters and the Iranian people, we most certainly need to make it clear to everyone that we are supporting them in their aspirations.  Moreover, as my former colleagues pointed out in the Wall Street Journal a few days back, there continues to be broad plain between the carefully worded statements coming from the Administration and the outer limits of appropriate support for these brave men and women.  While I hope that my former colleagues at the State Department are getting this right and doing the needful, my painful experience with them causes me to have grave doubts.  I had a ring-side seat on our failure to do everything we could to support Burma's democracy movement during the Saffron Revolution in 2007, a case where our public rhetoric far outpaced our private actions.  Again, I am hoping that the reverse is happening this time - the cautious remarks are masking a vigorous effort to figure out what needs to be done and do it - but the institutional bureaucratic barriers to this are high and the forces of the status quo are particularly tenacious among the Arabists who populate the professional ranks of the United States foreign policy community.    Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Amazing Iranians

This is my new blog.  I'll be writing about human rights and democracy, foreign policy -- especially in Asia, US politics, and whatever else catches my attention.  The topic de jour is what is happening in Iran.  I am totally obsessed with what these brave people are doing and can't stop reading about them (to the detriment of things I am supposed to be working on).  I don't have any illusions about the situation there, but I am still finding it totally inspiring and amazing.  I don't know how anyone could not be inspired by people who have the courage to walk out on the streets and face down thugs with guns, strictly because of an idea or a principle. 

It has also been fascinating to see how this has become a domestic political issue because of President Obama's response (or non-response, depending on who you ask).  I personally think he needs to start going over the heads of the mullahs and talk directly to the people of Iran, and do so in personal language about universal values of freedom and human rights, without all the lawyerly weasel words that sound like hedging even when they aren't.   Even the French have had better statements than BHO - not good!  Plus, if the mullahs are going to blame the US for the protests regardless of what we say or do, we should at least have the spine to stand up for the people who are being shot and beaten in the streets.  Should be interesting to see how this develops both there and here.


Sphere: Related Content