I continue to be amused by the lack of critical response to this bipolar (multi-polar?) policy approach on the part of the liberal media. Republicans are not being effective in taking advantage of his so-flexible-as-to-appear-unprincipled approach to foreign policy. The WSJ has a good piece on this speech that should serve as a roadmap for not only pointing out his wildly divergent regional foreign policies, but linking them up to some of his worst domestic policy ideas.
Sphere: Related Content
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
What's good for Africa is good for...Africa
Obama goes to Ghana and gives a "tough love" speech, preaching - seriously, he was practically hectoring these poor people -- to Africans that they need to get their house in order, embrace good governance, democracy, human rights and free trade, and stop blaming the West and colonialism for all their problems. Where was this guy in Cairo? Why isn't this kind of talk considered patronizing meddling or hypocritical (because of Gitmo, Abu Ghraib, etc.) when Obama does it in Africa, but would be if he were to say it to -- for example -- Iran or any other Middle Eastern country, Honduras, Russia or China, just to name a few who recently could have used a dose of "tough love" from Dr. O?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment